Monday, January 11, 2021

color color everywhere

i know it is a subject that many are split on - the colorization by topps of old photographs for use on their cards. some prefer the images to be left in black and white, which still allows for them to be used in many sets and inserts. others like the idea, but feel the quality of colorization is not quite adequate. there are other opinions as well. for me, i like that it brings new images of former players on to cardboard rather than recycling the same few images that were previously available in color format.

jackie robinson is one of those legendary players that shows up in many (most?) sets, but his cards suffered due to repetitious use of the same few images. so, i was happy to see a new (colorized) image used on a 2020 topps stadium club chrome card:
the card doesn't scan too well, but it looks nice in person. 

at first, i thought this was a card of jackie signing autographs at dodger stadium because of the colors of the railing and seating levels. that would mean that this photo was taken at an oldtimers game. as you can probably guess, i did some digging.

i knew that this image came no earlier than 1961, thanks to the kid wearing a twins hat. i also knew that jackie famously did not suit up for the 1972 oldtimers game at dodger stadium, which took place the same day that his jersey number was retired along with those of roy campanella and sandy koufax, and i wasn't aware of an earlier oldtimers game hosted by the dodgers.

a quick search led me to the photo at gettyimages
which listed its creation date as august 24, 1969 and its locale as anaheim stadium. i was also able to find an image of the program that someone is holding out for jackie
which matches that same date on which an oldtimers game at anaheim stadium was held. the program features sandy koufax and steve bilko, and this particular copy is signed by don newcombe, but not jackie robinson.

interestingly enough, the game featured don drysdale, who had announced his retirement just a couple of weeks earlier. here's an article by dodger historian mark langill that gives some more detail on drysdale's experience in the month of august, 1969. and here's an article from the los angeles times about the game itself, including some insight on jackie's experience. looks like if i were on twitter i would have saved myself some research time.

anyway, it's good to know that my instincts were correct - that's not dodger stadium. even though i didn't make it to the big a until 1979, i am pretty sure the color of the railing was always reddish-orange as it was then, and the concrete base was a darker color. here's an image of carl yastrzemski from the late 1960's/early 1970's at anaheim stadium that seems to support that recollection.
so you can see that the folks at topps who did the colorizing might have had dodger stadium on the mind instead, which isn't a bad thing except when colorizing black and white photos. i hope things improve in the coming years, because it is great to see a variety of images for the legendary players featured in modern day sets.  

10 comments:

  1. Fun and interesting post. Good research. I would definitely like to see higher quality colorization, and colorization used somewhat sparingly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i agree! when done correctly, colorization opens up the opportunity for some great cards.

      Delete
  2. Good job! Always a fan of nice baseball card detective work. Now if I can find a refractor version of that card.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i am also tempted to pick up a refractor and maybe some of the other refractor parallels, even if the colors aren't quite right.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I dislike colorized photos. I think it looks nicer just to have the black and white photo, because something always seems a bit off.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i think topps has shown that black and white photos can work in sets like stadium club (and in flagship sets in the 60s/70s). there have definitely been some colorized abominations as legend variations in recent flagship releases that would have been better served by staying in black and white.

      Delete
  5. I usually don't mind colorization, but the stadium flub on Robinson's card is just laziness on Topps part. It's that lack of detail that really takes away from what adding color provides.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i agree, matt. speaking of laziness, i should have pointed out that topps did at least leave the number on jackie's back blue instead of changing it to red like they did on a 2020 series 1 decades' best dodger card.

      Delete
  6. Colorization does sometimes work well for sports cards, but more often than not, it doesn't. I'm surprised that with all of the fancy technology that's out there now, that so many poor colorizations are still being done, one would think that somewhere along the line during the card making process that someone might notice how bad some of them look, and maybe either pull them from the product, or at least go back and try it again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i agree, jon. there was a ted williams photo variation in some recent topps release that should not have been printed it was so bad.

      Delete