Sunday, July 7, 2024

why did they bother?

i recently completed a dodger team set of the 1984 topps rub-downs release. the last "card" i needed featured pedro guerrero and a young slugger named darryl strawberry
the inclusion of strawberry is probably why i didn't have one of these previously, not that i was seeking them out in 1984. this was the sort of oddball that didn't appeal to me then, and even now i only went for it to complete the aforementioned team set. 

i was also missing the pedro guerrero "card" from the 1985 team set
if you are at all familiar with these releases, the fact that they are the same is not a surprise. the only difference between the two is the copyright date.

i am left to wonder why topps issued a second set in 1985 if they didn't make any changes to what they had released in 1984 in terms of design or subject matter? there are a few players who were on different teams in 1985 that were featured with their 1984 clubs - jack clark comes to mind - but that's not a big deal because the same can be said for topps flagship in 1985 (clark's team affiliation was updated in the traded set that year). 

i wonder if any kid who bought these in 1985 felt ripped off or even noticed if their intent was to transfer them to their o-pee-chee folder as quickly as possible. these days, i figure it's only team and player collectors who give any attention to these things.

6 comments:

  1. I've opened a box of the 1984 product... and still have an unopened box somewhere. Had no idea they released it again in 1985. It seems silly that they would keep most of the players photos the same. I wonder if they at least included Gwynn in the 1985 set. They left him out of the 1984 set.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just checked COMC... and they did include Mr. Padre.

      Delete
    2. thanks fuji - i didn't do a thorough review to see if there were any new players featured. at least there were a couple (dwight gooden being another)

      Delete
  2. This team collector doesn't give them much attention at all.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I don't think I had any idea that there was more than one set of these.

    ReplyDelete